![]() |
|
|
Click here to Buy a physical Copy
A review of the first version of my book: The Anatomy of Mona Lisa Unexplained Mysteries article: A real Da Vinci Code Ovi Magazine article: Mon Salai? Links: Realm of the Twelve (Last Supper) Mona Lisa Images for a Modern World Mona Lisa Turns 500, and Other Unproved 'Theories' Read the entire book online:
Chapter 13
|
Click here to Buy a physical Copy
A Critique
Pramod K. Uday.
Passion is often treated as something dangerous by the majority. In
the preface of my book, 'For the Sexy, Romantic Bibliophile',
I wrote:
Whenever a person chooses to be so passionate about anything, when
they choose to move on to the extremes or edges, rather than remain
in the safe inner regions, that person is bound to have insecurity
feelings and doubts, as he rarely finds any other human souls when
he looks around. Then that person may desperately seek out those
with similar passions, very often just to confirm his sanity, for
those who prefer the safe inner regions will definitely try to make
that person return back and join the crowd, the pack, by even
critically and self-righteously dubbing the odd one an insane
person. (Uday, Pramod K.; Pg # 15-16)
Now you might be wondering why I begin the critique of
this book by quoting the preface of one of my books that has no
similarity at all to the title under consideration. There may not be
any similarity in the themes, but I'm led to believe that at least
the authors take after each other! Derek is one of the most
passionate and sincere men of letters I have seen till date!
I had the time of my love reading this great intellectual
adventure on paper and find myself thinking my adjectives, which I
normally flaunt tastelessly, are not powerful or expressive enough
to put across to you the joy and thrill and pleasure I feel, now
that I have really 'studied' (and not just 'read') this awesome book
from cover to cover. When it ends, you feel like you want more! You
want the book to go on and on and never come to an end! As Lehmann-Haupt
wrote in The New York Times about Zukav, Derek's Love's Prison
is one of "the most exciting intellectual adventures I have been on"
as a reader, writer and a professional book reviewer.
Derek just steals your hearts away with his endearing and
desirable thirst for knowledge and also his willingness to pursue
the truth, not the subjective truth, but the objective truth. What
is especially laudable about this extraordinarily talented writer is
his philosophical propensity and humility that makes him raise that
celebrated question which was originally raised by Pilate in the
Bible, "What is truth?" You find an amazingly humble writer who
searches truth with unflagging zeal and passion and then when he
finally unravels the mystery, steps back, resigns to a quite corner,
letting the 'experts' take charge. He admits he is no expert and
invites all the professionals of the art field to test his findings.
That's (the testing) is up to you scientists out there and those who
know it. …. Remember, I am really no expert in any field (Bair,
Derek; pg # 323)
Derek had really done his best in enlarging the scope of
his book and it only renders it more readable. While discussing one
of the greatest geniuses of art, the immortal Leonardo da Vinci,
Derek also touches on a variety of topics ranging from obesity to
anger management, from religious tolerance to homosexuality.
Perhaps what I love the most about this book is what Derek himself
calls the "interjections", where he writes about the writing process
itself and also about himself. It also deals with the story behind
this story, shows you what was going on in the back stage, so to
speak. They look like extracts from the journals of a writer who has
led an amazingly eventful and intellectually exciting life. The
readers are bound to love the frankness, intimacy and the personal
warmth. Putting the book down after the initial reading, I feel like
I have found a kindred spirit in Derek. Might be an effect of the
intimate tone of the 'interjections' (I love that apt title)
This book calls for an intuitive interpretation; the
subjective style militates against the acceptance of this book by
those who tend to be more objective, by those who have accepted the
tyranny of the left hemisphere of the brain that controls logical
ratiocinations and linguistic activities. The sensitivity of Derek
is bound to take you by surprise, drawing all the sensitive readers
closer to him. Also note that I use the word 'sensitivity' without
attaching to it any of those myriads of pejorative connotations that
are normally attached to it by those who look down upon emotions and
feelings.
The empathic treatment of the close relationship between
Da Vinci and Salai is laudable. This analysis of the relationship
enables Derek to touch upon the controversial subject of
homosexuality. This analysis gives us ample glimpses of Derek's
tolerance, or rather, his ability to embrace and enjoy difference.
This also gives him a chance to comment on the misinterpretation of
the Holy Book and even worse, the inaccuracy and deliberate
frivolity involved in the translation and modernization of the Holy
Bible. As Derek points out, the original Biblical verse which says
"A man shall not lay with a man as he would a woman" was altered
(intentionally?) to "homosexuality is an abomination" in many
current versions under the pretext of "simplifying" the Bible.
Derek's subtle sarcasm comes through as he says "For some reason
people think it's perfectly ok to change what the original words
were – to intentionally make it worse." (Pg # 229)
Personally, what I love in this book the most is probably Derek's
theory regarding Mona Lisa based on the relationship between
Leonardo and Salai. I do not intend to spill the beans. Suffice it
to say that it is pure genius and nothing else. Derek, you do make a
valid and scientific point here and as a lover of art who lacks any
expertise in art, I invite all the experts and professionals of the
art field to examine Derek's theories in an objective way. Derek
really deserves your attention and objective analysis. You won't be
wasting your time reading and testing Derek's theories.
Derek is pleasantly philosophical at many sections of this book. To
illustrate, he asks: 'When you're closing your eyes what is it that
you're actually "seeing?" Is it complete darkness – the back of your
eye lids, or your mind?' (Pg # 266)
We are also bound to love Derek's ideas on writing:
"I think journaling and writing about yourself and your thoughts is
the single most beneficial thing you can do for yourself. It makes
something real, it solidifies something. Writing is the only
characteristic I can find that separates man from animal. Writing is
what makes us human in many ways. It's the essence of our humanity."
(Pg # 289)
The final chapter helps us see Derek's altruistic urges and also his
noble ambition to wipe out hunger and to reach out and support all
of humanity.
Passing on to the style, Derek surely needs the services of an
editor. The many linguistic errors might make the book appear "less
professional" to the shallow reader, who is more bothered about the
dress rather than the body, the language rather than the content,
almost as the stylistics of Russia who wanted to bring about
revolutionary changes in Literary Criticism at the beginning of the
last century. Please note that I said a "shallow reader". Being an
editor myself, my meticulous and overly critical eye couldn't help
noticing some of the linguistic aberrations such as a hesitancy to
use past participle form of verbs, the use of semicolons instead of
commas, the use of two dots as ellipsis, the use of the word
'affect' instead of 'effect' and so on. But even this 'defect',
curiously, only adds to the positive impression that Derek leaves on
our minds with his book. Those 'errors' could be seen as a result of
the writer's passion for his ideas, that leaves him with no time to
focus on the style or language. The writer loves his ideas so much
and the writing of those ideas excites him so much that those ideas
suck up all of his enthusiasm and energy, leaving him with no energy
which he can use to check the grammatical or linguistic accuracy of
his language.
After all, as Derek himself says, it is all a matter of
your perspective and perception. One remarkable thing about the book
is the impact that it can have on your perceptions. After reading
the book, I notice that my senses, especially the eyes, have been
made sharper by the book. I have sort of started looking at things
in a 'different' way. Just a few minutes ago, before I settled down
in front of my computer to type this review, my attention was
attracted by the shadow of the water in my green water bottle that I
had just taken out of refrigeration. On the shadow on the wall, I
noticed the water drops gracefully slithering down the sides of the
bottle onto my study table. Just a normal sight of course! But after
reading this book, it may not be so! It all depends on your
perception. And don't take my word; just grab your copy of this
wonderful book today and see for yourself!
To conclude, this Love's Prison is a thrilling and exciting
intellectual adventure that is bound to lure and satisfy all those
devoted art lovers and also all those who love intellectual
stimulation and the pleasure that they derive from it. As a writer,
editor and professional book reviewer, I strongly recommend this
book to all.
|